Introducing GenLink Read the announcement

Buying Backlinks: What Links Cost and What Google Does About Them

Paid links are a market with price lists, and Google's policy names them first among link spam. What a bought link costs, what the top-ranking guides advise, what Google actually does, and a five-step way to handle paid links.

BacklinksLink BuildingSEO
Abstract stacks of dark coin-like discs rising left to right, one cerise disc on top carrying a small ring tag, decorative

Buying backlinks means paying a site, directly or through a broker, to link to yours. Google's spam policy lists "Buying or selling links for ranking purposes" first among its examples of link spam, and allows paid links only when they carry rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow". So the useful test for any paid link is simple: would the seller label it sponsored? If not, you are paying for ranking credit, which is the part Google says it removes.

This guide covers what a bought link costs, what the top-ranking guides tell you to do, what Google says it does about it, and a five-step way to handle paid links without betting the site.

Short answers#

  • Is buying backlinks against Google's rules? Yes, if the link passes ranking credit. Paid links marked rel="sponsored" or rel="nofollow" are allowed. The policy.
  • How much do backlinks cost? An Ahrefs test found $361.44 on average for a link added to an existing page and $77.80 for a guest post. Quotes in the top guides run from $15 to $8,000. Prices.
  • What happens if Google spots paid links? Since December 2022 Google says SpamBrain neutralizes them, so the credit is lost. Patterns can also bring a manual action. What Google does.
  • Is a rel="sponsored" link worth buying? For traffic and exposure, sometimes. For rankings, no: the label exists to tell Google the link was paid for. When it's worth it.
  • What should I do instead? Earn links with outreach and assets people cite, and label anything you pay for. Five steps.

That covers the search. Each answer in detail comes next, then the five steps, then the evidence.

Google's spam policies, last updated 28 August 2026, define link spam as "creating links to or from a site primarily for the purpose of manipulating search rankings." The first example is "Buying or selling links for ranking purposes," which includes:

  • "Exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links"
  • "Exchanging goods or services for links"
  • "Sending someone a product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link"

The same page then says paying for links is not the problem in itself: "Google does understand that buying and selling links is a normal part of the economy of the web for advertising and sponsorship purposes. It's not a violation of our policies to have such links as long as they are qualified with a rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored" attribute value to the tag."

Google's page on qualifying outbound links says to "Mark links that are advertisements or paid placements (commonly called paid links) with the sponsored value," and that nofollow "is still an acceptable way to flag them, though sponsored is preferred." The dofollow vs nofollow guide covers all three attributes.

So the rule is about the label, not the money. A paid link with the label is advertising. A paid link without it is link spam.

The most useful public numbers come from one Ahrefs test, reported in its guide to buying backlinks. Joshua Hardwick asked 450 sites across nine niches to sell a link in their content. The answer: "$361.44, on average," and "only 12.6% of the sites I reached out to were willing to sell me a link." He pitched guest posts to 180 sites with "write for us" pages and found they cost "$77.80, on average," adding: "I didn't offer to pay for placement. Many site owners just sent their fees anyway." The same page cites Authority Hacker's survey of 755 link builders at "$83 on average." (That figure is as reported by Ahrefs; the original survey page has since been removed.)

Run the arithmetic on the first test. About 57 of the 450 sites agreed to sell, so each bought link took around eight cold emails before any money changed hands.

A range chart on a logarithmic price axis from 10 to 10,000 US dollars per link. Quotes pitched to SEO Sherpa ran from 15 to 8,000 dollars, a 533-fold spread. SEO Buddy gives 50 to 600 dollars per link. SEO Sherpa says most private sellers asked 100 to 200 dollars. Averages from tests sit in a narrow band: 77.80 dollars for paid guest posts and 361.44 dollars for links in existing content in Ahrefs tests, and 83 dollars in an Authority Hacker survey reported by Ahrefs.

The guides on page one quote a far wider spread. SEO Sherpa reports that "the most expensive link we got pitched was $8,000" and the cheapest was $15, with most private sellers asking "between $100 and $200." SEO Buddy puts it at "$50 to $600 per link." Price tracks what the seller thinks the site is worth, not what the link will do once Google sees it.

Two things, according to Google.

The outcome Google describes in its most recent link spam announcement is that the link stops counting. In the December 2022 link spam update, Google wrote: "we're leveraging the power of SpamBrain to neutralize the impact of unnatural links on search results," adding that "it can now detect both sites buying links, and sites used for the purpose of passing outgoing links," and "Ranking may change as spammy links are neutralized and any credit passed by these unnatural links are lost." You keep paying; the link quietly does nothing.

The other outcome is a penalty. Google's manual actions report describes "Unnatural links to your site" as "a pattern of unnatural, artificial, deceptive, or manipulative links pointing to your site," and warns that buying links "can result in some or all of your site getting a manual action."

A diagram of what happens to one paid link. If it carries rel=sponsored or nofollow, it is allowed under Google policy and passes no ranking credit, so judge it as an ad. If it carries no label, Google says SpamBrain can neutralize it, so the credit is lost while the money is spent. If unlabelled paid links form a pattern, Google can apply a manual action for unnatural links to some or all of the site. Illustrative, based on Google documentation.

Sometimes, for the reasons advertising is worth buying. A sponsored placement on a newsletter or site your buyers read can send traffic, signups and brand searches. Judge it as an ad: cost per visitor and cost per signup, against your other channels.

What a labelled link should not be bought for is rankings. If a seller refuses to add rel="sponsored", that tells you what you are paying for.

I read the top seven US results for "buy backlinks" on 7 October 2026. Two would not load (a 502 error and a bot check). Two were user uploads on borrowed domains: a student portfolio page on a university site, and a file in a research data site's user uploads folder (one of the two that would not load, so judged from its address). Both look like what Google's spam policies call site reputation abuse. With one tag archive showing only a 2015 teaser, that leaves three real guides, all from SEO agencies or vendors.

A two by two chart placing the five top results for buy backlinks that loaded, on 7 October 2026, by whether they warn of penalties and whether they tell readers to skip the sponsored or nofollow label. Two guides, SEO Sherpa and SEO Buddy, sit in the quadrant that both warns of penalties and tells readers to skip the label; both also list link prices. Solvid warns of penalties, lists prices and does not tell readers to skip the label. A user-uploaded university portfolio page and a 2015 tag archive warn of penalties and give no label advice. No page sits in the bottom half, which would be no penalty warning. Two further results did not load.

All five pages that loaded warn about penalties. Yet two of the three guides tell readers to make sure the bought link is not labelled. SEO Sherpa: links "should be followed and not "rel=sponsored" or "rel=nofollow"." SEO Buddy: "The links should not be rel=sponsored or rel=nofollow as these would tell search engines to ignore the links." SEO Sherpa also claims "there's practically no risk of a penalty because it's impossible for Google to distinguish what's a paid placement and what's not," a claim Google's own 2022 update post contradicts.

None of the seven offered a guarantee. That fits: no seller can promise a link Google has agreed to count.

Step 1: Decide what you are buying. Write down the goal before you pay: visitors, signups or brand reach. If the honest answer is "rankings," stop here; that is the purchase the policy names.

Step 2: Require the label in writing. Every paid placement, sponsored post, newsletter mention or gifted product review should carry rel="sponsored" (or nofollow). Put it in the order, check the live page, and recheck a month later.

Step 3: Vet the site as an ad buy. Look for real readers: recent comments, social shares, an audience that matches yours. A site with a "write for us" page that sends a fee schedule to anyone who asks is selling to everyone, and SpamBrain is built to find those.

Step 4: Skip packages and link farms. Bulk bundles, private blog networks and "DR 50+ for $20" offers are the pattern Google's update describes. They also tend to arrive at once, from unrelated sites. See toxic backlinks if you already have some.

Step 5: Spend the rest on links you earn. The money you would put into an unlabelled link buys a lot of outreach time. Offer an asset worth citing, such as a free tool or data study, to people already writing about the topic; resource pages and broken links are good starting lists. Track new referring domains each month.

Ahrefs needed eight cold emails per link a seller would take money for. The same emails, pitching something worth citing, earn links nobody has to hide. GenLink's backlink agent sends those pitches every day from your own domain and follows up for you.

Start with one agent free →

The limits of this evidence#

The Ahrefs prices come from one test with a deliberately plain pitch; the article was updated in July 2024 and does not say when the test ran. The $83 survey figure is reported by Ahrefs, and the original survey page now redirects. The price ranges in the guides are quotes the authors were pitched, not a sample. Seven results on one day is a snapshot, and two of them never loaded. And Google does not publish how often SpamBrain misses a paid link; "neutralize" is its claim, not something outsiders can measure.

Pay for reach, earn the rankings#

Buying backlinks is legal and common. Buying ranking credit is what Google's policy forbids, and since 2022 Google says SpamBrain can switch that credit off. Label what you pay for, judge it like an ad, and earn the links you want to count through outreach and pages worth citing.

No label to argue about. Links from editors who chose to cite you are the ones Google is built to count. Let an agent find those editors and pitch them while you build the page they will want to link to.

Try GenLink free →

Frequently asked questions#

Is buying backlinks illegal? No. It is not a legal matter in most places, but advertising disclosure rules can apply to sponsored content. For search, the question is Google's policy: unlabelled paid links that pass ranking credit are link spam.

Are paid guest posts the same as buying links? If you pay for the post and it links to you without rel="sponsored", Google's policy treats it as paid links, and its list names "guest posts" among advertorials that pass ranking credit. Unpaid guest posts an editor chooses to publish are different; see guest posting for backlinks.

Are niche edits buying links? A paid link inserted into an existing article is exactly what Ahrefs priced at $361.44. Our niche edits guide covers when an insertion is earned and when it is bought.

Can Google tell if a link is paid? Not always, but Google says SpamBrain "can now detect both sites buying links, and sites used for the purpose of passing outgoing links." Sites that sell to anyone leave patterns: fee schedules, unrelated outbound links and sudden bursts of links.

Should I disavow links I bought in the past? If you have a manual action for unnatural links, yes, after trying to get them removed or labelled. Without one, Google's own disavow guidance starts by asking whether you need the tool at all. Our toxic backlinks guide explains when the disavow tool is worth using.

Do sponsored links help SEO at all? Not as ranking credit, by design. They can help indirectly by sending visitors who later search for your brand or link to you on their own.

Keep readingAll posts
GenLink

Put the playbook to work.

The agent finds relevant high-authority sites, writes a personal pitch, follows up, and lands the backlink. You point it at the goal.

Start free